Iran Is Restricting the Social Sciences: Is a New Wave of Terrorism Coming?

For some time now, Iran has been clamping down on the social sciences and invoking the names of various social scientists in their show trials of reformists.  The Chronicle of Higher Education has suggested that the underlying reason for this is that the Iranian government wishes to clamp down on efforts to justify any civil society independent of the government.  This very plausible argument roots the Iranian government’s motivations in raw secular politics.

Now, however, Iran is banning universities from opening new departments in twelve fields and further announcing that curricula in these fields will be utterly revamped, all on the grounds that these various fields are Western or else are being taught from a Western perspective.  An official of the Ministry of Education explained that “The content of the current courses in the 12 subjects is not in harmony with religious fundamentals, and they are based on Western schools of thought.”  In other words, these subjects are purportedly un-Islamic.  Apparently this follows remarks last year by Grand Ayatollah Khamenei that these subjects can lead Muslims to doubt their faith.

The particular social sciences in question include law, philosophy, management, sociology, psychology, political science, women’s studies, and human rights.

I rather wonder whether this will eventually lead to an increase in the number of terrorists and extremists.  There has been much discussion in recent years about how a disproportionate number of terrorists are engineers.  Gambetta and Hertog’s “Engineers of Jihad” got the ball rolling.  (It’s important to note that their paper was not just talking about Sunni Muslim extremists and that, in fact, most of its data came from well before 9/11.)  British intelligence several years ago also observed that “extremist recruiters” on college campuses in the UK were focusing on people in the engineering and IT fields.

Now, it’s not clear which direction the causal arrow points.  Do people become radicalized because they are engineers?  Or do they become engineers because they are radicalized?  Or, for that matter, do they become radicals and engineers because both phenomena are caused in parallel by some other variable?

If, however, the answer is the first of these three, that radicalization is a result of being an engineer, I rather wonder if the impending eviscerati0n of Iranian social sciences isn’t going to lead to another wave of terrorism.  More generally, might it lead also to a future wave of particularly doctrinaire Iranian government officials.  (Ahmedinejad was trained as an engineer, by the way.)  After all, some proportion of those students who can’t study the social sciences will go into engineering.

As an aside, it’s interesting to compare Iran’s view that these sciences are un-Islamic with the views of Sayyid Qutb (a Sunni Arab) and his acolytes in the al Qaida world.  Qutb wrote in Milestones that some sciences such as psychology were un-Islamic, essentially because these sciences spoke about the soul, which was an intrinsically religious topic.  Other fields, however, were just fine because technical knowledge, he thought, was neither good nor bad, neither Islamic nor un-Islamic.  Indeed, his various followers have gone on to use this understanding in their pursuit of the jihad.  Abu Bakr Naji, for instance, urged jihadists to read books on management.  Quite a number of jihadists have talked about political science.  (In fact, I have argued that the default jihadist view of the Christian world has strong realist elements to it.)

In any event, the Iranian government is clearly shooting the country and the Iranian people in the foot .  The only question, really, is whether this should evoke in us feelings of pity or also feelings of alarm.

Published in: on October 25, 2010 at 6:41 AM  Comments (5)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. very interesting blog,i enjoyed it so much i have bookmarked it and look forward to your updates..keep up the good work

  2. I think Iran does not produce terrorism, I think Iran should be given chance

  3. Iran Is Restricting the Social Sciences: Is a New Wave of ……

    Here at World Spinner we are debating the same thing……

  4. Iran seems to be a calm country.We can’t blame every country,if it does not follow the regulations.

  5. I’m way late on this post, but found it very interesting. I tend to agree that the elimination of social sciences will lead to greater extremism, which can produce terrorism and terrorist. Without a place for the research in and discussion of rights of the people and the understanding of others through sociology and psychology, man will inherently turn towards those most like him.

    I have a different take on the recruitment of engineers. I don’t disagree that there have been, will be and currently are those individuals that set out to be a terrorist and choose an engineering field as a way to most effectively carry out that task. Yet, I don’t believe that this is the norm. You state in your book, I believe, that AQAM has struggled to keep initially passionate followers to maintain their drive and direction. It seems outside their capability that they’d be able to keep large numbers of recruits properly focused on jihad while attending a school in pursuit of an engineering degree.

    I think a more likely explanation is that those entering engineering fields are doing so because they are trying to improve themselves and their country/town/etc. They are seeking the ability to build something. Tragically, those most passionately pursuing progress are susceptible to those that can convince them that progress through building is not possible while an obstacle exists.

    AQAM can utilize the difficulties with the US and Israel to manipulate students at an impressionable age, from an impressionable background, to shift their focus from creation to destruction, by holding out the carrot of having a greater hand in improving the lot of his fellow men than the building of a waterworks or informational architecture.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: