Wikileaks and Tunisia

PBS’ Frontline is broadcasting a really excellent show about Wikileaks and Bradley Manning.  HOWEVER…they just strongly implied that a batch of a dozen State Department cables about corruption in Tunisia that Wikileaks released helped spark the uprisings in Tunisia and hence the whole Arab Spring movement.

Is there any real evidence for this?  Surely the people of Tunisia knew that their government was corrupt.  I can’t imagine that they needed Wikileaks to tell them that the State Department thought there was corruption at work before they got it.

To me this sounds like another case of people making the United States out to be more powerful than it is and denying agency to people elsewhere in the world.

Published in: on May 25, 2011 at 1:57 AM  Comments (3)  
Tags: , ,

American Suicide Bomber…50 Years Ago

Just a quick comment on something interesting I just ran across.  There’s an interesting article on CNN.com about a man named Richard Pavlick who planned to blow up himself and President-elect John F. Kennedy in 1960 with a suicide car bomb.  He actually came quite close to doing it on Sunday 11 December 1960 but at the critical moment Kennedy walked out of his residence in the company of Jackie and children Caroline and John Jr.  Pavlick didn’t want to kill the wife and children so he held off and didn’t drive his car filled with dynamite at JFK.  He was arrested a few days later.  Because there was a major plane crash over New York the day that his arrest was announced, the story never got much attention.

This incident is yet another illustration of the fact that suicide bombing is not an exclusively Muslim phenomenon, as Robert Pape has been telling us for some years.  That’s old news, however.  What I find more interesting is that this happened long, long before suicide bombing hit the newspapers.  This was, it would appear, a truly homegrown, utterly indigenous event.  Moreover, Pavlick came to much the same solution as today’s best and brightest terrorists have as.

There are at least two routes by which innovation in military and terrorist affairs happen: either through borrowing ideas from others or by inventing ideas out of whole cloth.  Lots of work has been done–some of it by me–on how terrorists read history, foreign doctrinal manuals, etc., and learn from others.  Less exciting, but comparably important, however, is the the fact that the morphology of a problem will often lead people separated from each other in space and time to develop similar solutions.  That’s what we saw with Pavlick.

One of the pieces of received wisdom in the world of terrorism studies is that terrorist’s tend to be “operationally conservative,” that is to say that they repeatedly use guns and explosives to do their work and seldom, in fact, use more exotic bits of equipment.  In my opinion, there are many problems with this argument, but let me just note one.  If isolated people come up with similar solutions to similar problems, is that a sign of some sort of cosmic conservatism that afflicts all terrorists or is it instead a logical consequence of the fact that these problems are all alike?

I vote for the latter choice.

Published in: on October 25, 2010 at 1:01 AM  Leave a Comment  
Tags: ,

U.S. Civil Rights Movement As An Insurgency

Mark Grimsley’s blog has an interesting discussion going on–to which I have contributed in a small way–as to whether the U.S. Civil Rights movement can and should be understood as an insurgency.  I’m with Grimsley that it can, but it’s worth thinking about in any case.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56 other followers